Movie Review - Pitch Perfect

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 25 November 2012

Card Game Review - Down In Flames: Guns Blazing

Posted on 18:10 by Unknown
We need to start a campaign to stop ugly games. We'll have an online petition and send letters to our state representatives. The petition will be something like, 'We hereby do swear to talk like lawyers as we ask for a law that will make people stop producing ugly games.' This is necessary because there are just too many ugly games out there, and some of them might be fun, except for they are so darn ugly.

Case in point - Down In Flames. It's a card game about WWII airplane fights. It should be basically pretty awesome, because it has a few cool ideas and some neat stuff that could work, except that unfortunately it's just butt ugly. I mean, I've had the game for months and haven't written anything because the game was so unattractive that I didn't have any desire to play it.

The cards could have been cool. They have art on them depicting airplanes shooting at each other, but they look like someone made cheap 3D models and shoved them on top of a Photoshop cloud background. If they had actual awesome art, from awesome artists, you would want to play just because they would look cool. But when even the design elements scream, 'this is a boring game,' it's hard to get motivated to crack the cigarette wrappers and shuffle up a game.

Conceptually, there are cool ideas in this box. There are two things you can rely on Dan Verssen Games to deliver - one, they will be ugly, and two, they will be meticulously researched and developed. The dogfights are short and brutal, with maneuvering and card management and lots of luck when you're drawing cards. Dive or climb? Shake your tail and get clear or jink sideways to get a better position? Fire full out, or spread the attack over a few different trigger pulls? Lots of neat ideas create excellent decision-making conundrums (should that be conundra? Probably).

Unfortunately, if you play this game in its most basic mode - two opposing airplanes in a sky duel - it's not particularly interesting. Sure, there's card play and stuff, but it mostly comes down to being luckier than the other guy. There's a little maneuvering, and a few smart card plays can tilt the balance, but mostly you just hope you get the right cards to keep your ass in your plane and your finger on the trigger. If you only bought this game for the mano-a-mano dogfights, you would be disappointed. Because not only did you get a game that looks like the south end of a north-bound pack mule, but the game itself is kind of on the dull side.

Which is why there are like a hundred planes in the box. Not literally, of course - the printers would be furious, trying to fit all those airplanes into one box. No, they're all on cards. There are fighters and bombers and - well, there are fighters and bombers. That's about what we had in WWII. But there are enough different planes, plus lots of different scenarios, that you can run a complicated bombing run over Germany or a kamikaze attack on an aircraft carrier. You can fly through flak attacks or send whole fighter squadrons after other fighter squadrons. You can even team up, and have British and American planes battling two squadrons of German Luftwaffe.

It's actually a really good thing this advanced play is in the box, because in my book, they were on two strikes with no balls up to this point. The more complicated scenarios are no grand slam, but they're a solid base hit, maybe a double to left field. With this more interesting format, what starts as a dry, ugly dogfight game becomes an involved, strategic, ugly dogfight game.

This is where the game really comes to life. You can build big airborne battles, count victory points, jockey for position, and otherwise play out a really interesting fight in the sky. There are several scenarios to pick from, with their own special rules, and there's no reason you can't play the ones you like more than once. This is really the redeeming feature of Down In Flames, because these big battles introduce a much greater degree of intelligent card play.

If you're looking for a clean, smart, attractive game about airplane battles, this is not the game you've been hunting. It's busy and ugly (though it is smart). DVG makes involved games for people who want to spend some time using their heads, and if that's the kind of dogfight game you want to play, Down In Flames should be just your cup of tea. If they hired a couple really good artists, it would be my cup of tea, too, but as long as the cards make my inner artist want to choke on its own inner vomit, I am not looking forward to the expansion.

Summary

2-4 players

Pros
Some cool dogfighting card play ideas
Exciting theme
A great expanded mode makes for much more interesting aerial battles

Cons
Super ugly
Played as a straight-up two-plane dogfight, it's a little weak

If you want to learn more about Down In Flames, maybe because you prefer ugly things, you can check the DVG site right here:
UGLY PLANES KICKING UGLY PLANE ASS
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Event Review - Fixing the Fence
    I was going to write a review of To Kill A Mockingbird tonight. I took my kids to see a remastered version of the 1967 classic last week. Th...
  • Racing Game Review - Nitro Dice
    I am not a fan of professional car racing, as a sport, though I am more than willing to concede that it could be pretty cool. But I might be...
  • Expansion Review - Loot and Scoot Expansion
    I'm going to get this out of the way, right off the bat, so that we don't have to keep talking about it - the game components produc...
  • Expansion Review - Defenders of the Realm Dragon Expansion
    The funny thing about expansions is that while I love to get them, and I love to play them, I don't really like reviewing them all that ...
  • Party Game Review - Reverse Charades
    Charades is one of those games that everyone actually likes playing, but nobody will admit to it. It's pretty fun to act out silly phras...
  • Board Game Review - Legitimacy
    Think about how many people you know. Exclude any that you met just because of games - they skew the data for this intellectual experiment. ...
  • Board Game Review - Dominare
    I know this is starting to sound like a broken record, but I really love the idea behind the Tempest games, where you unravel a story that i...
  • Expansion Review - Thunderstone: Dragonspire
    Once again, I'm handing over tonight's review to my favorite (read: only) guest reviewer - my dad. He likes Thunderstone, and I don...
  • Fantastic Board Game Review - Rex: Final Days of an Empire
    I sometimes question my gamer credibility. I read stuff written by all these really impressive nerds who have tons of references and who hav...
  • General Rant - Fixing What's Not Broken
    I have a review already written for tonight. It's pretty good, too, with plenty of crude, base humor and some truly tasteless nods to cu...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (67)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2012 (152)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ▼  November (12)
      • Board Game Review - Capital Offensive
      • Card Game Review - Down In Flames: Guns Blazing
      • Holiday Report - Thanksgiving
      • Movie Review - Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
      • Board Game Review - Archipelago
      • Comic Book Review - Chew
      • Rant - Screw Your FLGS
      • Board Game Review - Thunderbolt Apache Leader
      • Book Review - World War Z
      • Observation - Rise of the Dead
      • Abstract Game Review - Serpent Stone
      • Nothing Review - Not Doing Anything
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2011 (156)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2010 (125)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (14)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile